Pyramiden in Gizeh

00:08
[Music] hello everybody and welcome to Ancient Architects please subscribe to the channel for regular content on ancient architecture as well as all of the latest news from the world of archaeology archaeological discoveries really can be exciting and one so-called new discovery has taken the world by storm that there are huge deep man-made structures below the pyramid of Caffrey i have to be honest and say my first thought was this is absolute rubbish the claims are impossible they're crazy they defy sense and logic
00:50
that there are five unopened man-made structures inside the cafe pyramid that look like the great pyramids king's chamber and relieving chamber arrangement but then it gets even more unbelievable with claims there are eight man-made vertically aligned cylinder-like structures extending through the limestone bedrock for a whopping 648 m each with its own winding stairway and culminating in two large cubic structures with sides measuring around 80 m to put that into perspective the Empire State Building is 443 m in height
01:31
so the so-called man-made cylinders are much much larger and the cubic structures are nearly twice as tall as the Statue of Liberty with everything we know about history ancient architecture and engineering my brain just instantly calls on this entire discovery but of course that's not a good argument against it it's unscientific and it was merely my initial opinion so this past week before jumping into making a video I've tried my best to understand firstly the science try to understand if the method is credible and
02:10
also if the interpretations are valid in this video I'll walk you through my thinking and I'll also list a number of questions and concerns that I'd like to see resolved and answered in the forthcoming press conference and associated scientific paper so let's start with the science the science behind the discovery is apparently called synthetic aperture radar Doppler tomography or S for short a technology that is of course very real but rarely used to detect anything below ground that is not its primary
02:48
use and this is a very very complicated subject so I'll try and simplify everything the best I can synthetic aperture radar is a form of radar that is used to create 2D and 3D images of objects and landscapes the radar equipment is carried aboard planes and satellites an instrument sends out pulses of energy and then records the amount of that energy reflected back after it interacts with targets on Earth from the data received you can detect things unseen with a naked eye or traditional methods of image capture you
03:28
get back data showing energy intensity and from this it can be calibrated and incredibly detailed pictures can be obtained it's a real scientific technique and it is used in archaeology but can it see through soil and rock well the technology has been used to find subsurface features but mainly in soil and always very shallow targets it can't penetrate deep into the bedrock for example one user on X formerly Twitter with the handle the Daddy Shark said the following quote S operates via microwave reflections it
04:11
measures surface features not deep underground chambers vibration-based imaging from orbit is science fiction there's no realistic way to reconstruct kilometers deep structures from pixel motion analysis alone even in S the most advanced S vibration technique only detects large scale surface shifts it's used for monitoring earthquakes not mapping underground cities end quote he then provides advanced mathematics to show that microwave reflections can only penetrate about 1 meter of limestone bedrock but according to researcher Manu
04:55
safe who has also been researching the science the principles behind the science of the new study should not be dismissed because the scientists are not claiming the radar waves are penetrating 2 km of bedrock they're looking at microotions detected at the surface level so excuse the jargon they are modeling subsurface harmonically resonating voids that are projected on the surface above the voids are detected as surface microotions the satellite only detects this motion at the surface not the resonating void
05:35
itself from these surface motions the location and depth of any void can then be reconstructed according to Manu safe the scientific method in theory does work although at this stage he and others are unsure exactly how to reconstruct the data because the software to calibrate these surface motions to turn them into 2D and then 3D depth profiles to highlight any voids is the brainchild of one of the scientists involved in the project Filippo Beyond right now we're taking his word that his software works is his software
06:17
and his algorithm we have to accept so why should we accept it that is a fair question and I would want to see comparative studies where the S microotion technique can see known structures within the bedrock we need a comparison well to be fair to Beyond on his website harmonicsar.com he does show a comparative study where his method was used on the Grand Saso Mountain in Italy to accurately locate known tunnels and also the Grand Saso physics lab and these are located 1.4 km below ground i've left links in the description below
07:02
i can't give any personal comment or critique on any of the science because it's well out of my area of expertise so at this stage I would like Beyond to do two things and no not for me but for everyone that's interested in the pyramids of Egypt number one please release full details of all the stages taken to turn open access S data into this 3D diagram your software is the key to all of this and to gain acceptance by the wider scientific and archaeological community there needs to be complete
07:41
transparency and the findings do need to be independently verified by scientists unaffiliated with the Cafrey S project number two can we please see more comparative studies i would like to see the scan results of another patch of limestone bedrock in northern Egypt maybe close to Giza ideally the same geological formation but without any known archaeology above ground this way we can see how a standard patch of limestone bedrock looks using your method the more comparative studies the better because it will instill trust in your
08:23
work i'd like to see every stage the raw data the calibrated data the 3D modeling and the interpretation with full transparency as to how the method actually works so that's the science and if all the above can be done well I can accept it scientific breakthroughs are made all the time and I am absolutely in no position to judge what can be done and what can't be done like I said it's way out of my every year of expertise from this point on in good faith I'll accept that these diagrams this data is what the team got back but
09:05
my next concerns and questions are all regarding the interpretations of the data how do you go from this to this and also this to this what concerns me most of all with this study is that a scientist gets some fuzzy data from his S microotion method and somehow ends up with eight giant man-made cylinders with spiral stairways taller than the Empire State Building and leading to cube-like structures twice as big as the Statue of Liberty a substantial part of these structures would be below the water table and no
09:46
not just today not just in dynastic history in pre-dynastic history but ever since the river Nile has been an active river and certainly all the way through the African humid period humans do build cylinder structures going into the bedrock but this is to reach the groundwater they're called wells but they don't carry on for hundreds more meters it doesn't make any sense why would anyone modern-day people ancient Egyptians mythical Atlantanss or a lost civilization build a lost city that was partly underwater in what has to be said
10:28
is very fractured faulted costic and very poor quality limestone bedrock why build a lost city this close to the Nile River you'd build it a few kilometers into the desert if you were clever enough to build this city you wouldn't be stupid enough to put it next to a river the team are talking about a lost city and a lost hall of records being discovered and that the structures are all man-made but this makes no logical sense it doesn't make sense hydraologically because a substantial part of the
11:05
structures are underwater it doesn't make sense geologically because it is a terrible place to build a lost city in badly weathered limestone and right next to the Nile River it also does not make sense historically because it doesn't fit into any historical context and it also doesn't make any engineering sense as well humans being in the main practical people as seen by the archeological discoveries from every era of history these structures being so enormous and so timeconuming to make and so pointless having a large amount
11:44
underwater really defy logic and where did all the excavated rock and rubble go we're looking at rock with a volume of say 10 or more empire state buildings excavated from the earth so where is this rock because it wasn't used to build the pyramids of Egypt because we do know exactly where the quaries were i therefore believe wholeheartedly that the interpretation is completely wrong i can't see a scenario where it makes realistic sense that is my opinion for now again I will reiterate I'm no expert but to me this leaves only two
12:26
ways to interpret the data we're either looking at noise or artifacts in the calibrated scan data or we're looking at natural geological features to be able to so quickly come out with the interpretation that we're looking at man-made superructures going down for hundreds of meters that being the expert opinion of scientists involved in the study means they must have taken every other option every other interpretation into account so I now have some more questions for the team which I'm saying publicly in a
13:04
video for the record and for transparency with my viewers number one if you've detected man-made structures going down for hundreds of meters into the bedrock you must have a very clear and detailed understanding of the geology specifically directly beneath the cafrey pyramid because you're able to rule out a natural explanation i know and so do many others that the Giza limestone is riddled with faults and fissures at Giza there are vast cave networks all of which are natural as seen leading from the tomb of the birds
13:42
and these may well extend all the way to the cafrey pyramid there are also ironri mineralized veins running next to and beneath the cafrey pyramid there are multiple bedding planes from numerous limestone beds and these beds have lateral changes in thickness and because of groundwater movement I'm sure they've all undergone some weathering so can the scientists please explain in detail why their so-called man-made features can't be natural voids like caves faults and fissures and also weathered bedding planes all such
14:20
features can appear regular and also linear in shape and size as they follow natural zones of weakness relatively straight tectonic faults and fissures and relatively straight bedding planes number two how come you've been unable to find the bleon chamber in your calibrated data and also the lower chamber the horizontal passageway and the two descending passages if you have found them can we see how they appear in the raw data we need to see the known structures in the raw data as an absolute minimum on your Facebook page you say
14:59
the reason is because the horizontal passage in the Belleone chamber are both embedded in a limestone slab and that this absorbs the signal but they're not in a limestone slab whatever that means they're just cut into the natural limestone bedrock number three the cafe pyramid was muon scanned in the 1960s this central cone region was scanned and so why doesn't this chamber and its associated relieving chambers appear in the old data the scientists in the 1960s found absolutely nothing and they did ensure
15:37
there were strict and accurate controls in their experiment they did ensure the Muan scan was effective if you found chambers they should have appeared in the Muan scans number four okay so if we say the scans from the 1960s were in fact wrong well I'm aware the CF pyramid was or is being scanned again this time by the Scan Pyramids project the team who successfully identified two voids in the Great Pyramid and their technique has been ground trouthed as well as we've now seen inside the northace
16:15
corridor so my question is will you be talking to scan pyramids to compare data sets number five ground penetrating radar took place in the 1970s from inside the Belleone chamber scientists were looking beneath the pyramid the acoustic soundings did discover two voids both likely natural one being 21 m below ground and the other one being 33 the data was published and is available so where are these specific voids in your data if you can claim to see for hundreds of meters below the pyramid where are these two relatively
16:59
shallow cavities that were found in the 1970s furthermore can you also explain why the team in the 1970s did not see any hint of a giant cylinder or winding walkway number six we know there are multiple voids and cavities in all the pyramids of Egypt including the Great Pyramid the core structure of pyramids is not perfectly built the core limestone is not beautifully cut and placed with millimeter precision and a lot of the stone can be described as rubble and there are also sandfield voids and also empty
17:38
voids so I want to ask these researchers how they differentiated constructional voids within the coremasonry from the so-called unopen built chambers they've apparently discovered the questions and concerns I've outlined in this video I believe are all absolutely fair and valid to make extraordinary bold claims on the most iconic archaeological site in the world does require extraordinary evidence the team need to silence the doubters including me and you don't do that by banning comments on your
18:16
Facebook page after I listed these exact same questions on your posts at the weekend because trust me nobody wants this to be true more than me if the claims made are real they would be earthshattering the greatest archaeological discovery in the history of mankind but right now we need absolute transparency in the methods used both regarding how the software actually works and also how you interpreted the data because now the team are also scanning the entire Giza plateau and they put this diagram into their press
18:54
release apparently we're looking at a south to north view of Giza and look all of these features follow the natural sloping bedding planes of the limestone at Giza a limestone that's been heavily weathered for millions of years and is now filled with caves fissures and faults this new picture could well be geology and looking at these scans of Giza and we do see a lot of vertical features and to me these clearly look like noise or artifacts of the scan in my opinion these are features and this is noise so could the giant
19:36
cylinders below the cafe pyramid just be a zoomed-in view of this vertical noise i don't know at this point I have to give my honest opinion and say that yes okay maybe the science is valid i'm in no place to question that but regarding the interpretation I think we could well be looking at No I think we can only be looking at noise or nature thank you very much for watching this episode of Ancient Architects if you enjoyed the video please subscribe to the channel please like the video and please leave a comment below thank you
20:16
very much